Radiometric dating methods are completely unreliable Free no register and no sign up porn cams

Posted by / 20-Mar-2020 07:25

Without these observations you cannot be sure that the time is valid.That is why you need at least two, sometimes three judges to measure the time of the race to the standard needed to enter the record books.Radiometric dating is very reliable in theory - the decay of radioactive materials is very-very predictable.

We can now calibrate this out by looking at C14 in tree rings of a known age - but the charge of "C14 dates are wrong" is used by nutters (sorry creationists) either deliberately or in ignorance.You could describe the atomic workings of the quartz oscillator and how it resonates at a specific and highly stable frequency, and how this is used to accurately pace a timekeeping mechanism.But without reliable witnesses the accuracy of the watch makes no difference.In other words, the fatal problem with all radioactive dates is that they are all based on assumptions about the past.You can get any date you like depending on the assumptions you make.

radiometric dating methods are completely unreliable-64radiometric dating methods are completely unreliable-36radiometric dating methods are completely unreliable-70

This swimmer is competing in a 1,500 metre race and we have an accurate, calibrated wristwatch.

One thought on “radiometric dating methods are completely unreliable”

  1. I remind them that dating a Brit is no different than dating an American because you don’t experience extreme culture shock when visiting their country, and you can understand their language naturally without carrying a translation dictionary (although some people may beg to differ).